I don't know why I felt the need to blog about this, but for some reason I get so frustrated when people don't know the correct information regarding the "Disney Princesses," or they are hateful against them. I know, I know, not everyone treated Disney as a religion like I did as a child, but I just can't help but find myself getting sooo frustrated when people first off, don't know the correct information, or they do know it but refuse to use it. Secondly, nothing makes me as angry as someone insulting the princesses with anti-feminism, or that they aren't good role models.
First, I would like to state my credentials for this argument; I minored in Child Development, and studied Children's Entertainment as my emphasis throughout College. I am also a huge feminist, and I work very hard to support my rights as a woman, as well as all women. Finally, I analyzed Disney Movies very closely throughout my childhood and young adulthood. Very good, let's continue.
I am going to go through every princess and their official title, then we can approach society's issue's with them.
Natural Born Princesses (In Order of their Appearances):
Snow White 1937-- Born a princess, and was raised by her step-mother "The Evil Queen." Who was actually a horrible step-mom. duh!
Aurora 1959-- Was born Princess Aurora to the King and Queen, but do to Maleficent's curse she was forced to live as a commoner.
Ariel 1989-- The youngest born of King Trident, ruler of the Seven Seas.
Jasmine 1992-- The only daughter of the Sultan of Agrabah.
Pocahontas 1995-- The Daughter of the Chief of their Native American tribe.
Rapunzel 2010-- Born to the King and Queen and was kidnapped by Mother Gothel.
Merida 2012-- Born to the Scottish King and Queen
Married Into Royalty:
Cinderella 1950-- Her evil step-mother turned her into a slave, but luckily she snuck into the ball and convinced Prince Charming to marry her, making her Princess Cinderella.
Belle 1991-- She wanted so much more than her provincial life, and ended up in the castle with a beast. Luckily for her, that beast turned into major hottie prince and she married him, making her Princess Belle.
Tiana 2009-- She worked her butt off everyday to build a restaurant, ended up kissing a frog, who turned her into a frog, who had a weird frog romance. But thank God, in the end those Frogs turned back into humans and Prince Naveen married her, making her Princess Tiana.
Esmeralda 1996-- Gypsy. Didn't marry a prince, but didn't marry the humpback either so I don't know how I feel about her.
Mulan 1998-- Common girl turned warrior, fell in love with a General, most likely married said General in Mulan 2. Therefore is NOT a princess. However, Disney has to include her with the Princess gang to appeal to their Asian demographic.
Jane 1999-- Common girl who married a Ape Man..... yeah. Definitely doesn't make her a princess, unless you count her a Princess of the jungle. I could maybe accept that.
Giselle 2007-- Common girl in fantasyland, who was going to marry the Fabulous Prince Edward aka James Marsden. But instead settled for Patrick Dempsey in the real world, therefore making her not a princess.
Odette (Swan Princess) 1994
Alrighty, now that's settled let's jump into some of the major issues that people have with the princesses.
2) Stockholm Syndrome Belle- Ughhh... This one really gets my goat! First off here are the symptoms of Stockholm Syndrome according to Medical Symptoms Online:
Stockholm syndrome does not affect all hostages (or persons in comparable situations); in fact, a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) study of over 1200 hostage-taking incidents found that 92% of the hostages did notdevelop Stockholm syndrome. FBI researchers then interviewed flight attendants who had been taken hostage during airplane hijackings, and concluded that three factors are necessary for the syndrome to develop:
- The crisis situation lasts for several days or longer.
- The hostage takers remain in contact with the hostages; that is, the hostages are not placed in a separate room.
- The hostage takers show some kindness toward the hostages or at least refrain from harming them. Hostages abused by captors typically feel anger toward them and do not usually develop the syndrome.
In addition, people who often feel helpless in other stressful life situations or are willing to do anything in order to survive seem to be more susceptible to developing Stockholm syndrome if they are taken hostage.
People with Stockholm syndrome report the same symptoms as those diagnosed with posttraumatic stressdisorder (PTSD): insomnia, nightmares, general irritability, difficulty concentrating, being easily startled, feelings of unreality or confusion, inability to enjoy previously pleasurable experiences, increased distrust of others, and flashbacks.
So, yes there are similarities between Stockholm Syndrome and Belle's situation, but there is so much more depth to her situation. First of all, she wasn't taken hostage at gun point or against her will. She volunteered to save her father. That is a very noble thing and the Beast recognized that and responded to it. Secondly, he placed her in her own room away from him, and he moped around the West Wing for a good portion of the movie. Belle is with the talking objects way more than she is with the Beast. The Beast isn't a bad guy, he just doesn't know how to act properly. He held her father captive because he is French Royalty, that's what you do when someone breaks the law in your country. He only took her in place of her father because he thought she was cute and might be able to fall in love with her to break the curse. There was no other motive, she would have no other reason to sympathize with him for keeping her (which is generally what Stockholm syndrome is, more of a emotional sympathy for your captor, not love) but she did sympathize with him in his situation in life, that he was cursed to be a beast. In Fact, she was pretty pissed off in the beginning and stood up for herself just fine! Belle has no other symptoms of Stockholm Syndrome besides that she fell in love with him. She fell in love with the man behind the curse, she was able to look past his beastly appearance and see that he was a human being with a kind heart and soul, and was capable of love.
This movie is has one of the best moral themes of all time, and that's not to judge someone on the outside, but to look past the exterior and see who the person is on the inside. All of us as humans and as a society have trouble with that! Look at all girls with eating disorders, and the magazines in this country. There is such pressure on outwardly appearances that people are DYING to fit the part. And of course people look at this movie and go "Of course Belle has a psychological disorder, she couldn't have really fallen in love with a beast" and that's what is so sad about people who think this way, this movie is trying to teach good values and to show that there is more to people than the way they look, and yet people can't accept it.
3) Unnatural Hair Expectations- They are animated, get over it. Of course their hair is awesome, I would have been pretty pissed as a little girl if the princess on the TV didn't have awesome hair. Besides, its way more fun to play with the barbies of princesses who have long thick hair.
4) Body Images- I'm not even going to defend the Princesses perfect bodies, but I will say that the are cartoons. In animation there is always a bit of exaggeration, so naturally their eyes are bigger, and they have thin waist and curvy hips. But again, as a little girl watching these movies they aren't looking at them and comparing their own bodies to the princesses, because they are cartoons! There is no way they are close to a real girls body and young children understand that more than we give them credit for. It is much more harmful for them to see the real models of today than to see the princesses.
5) Racism/ Ethnicity - Obviously this is a HUGE issue, which is why I saved it for last. I cannot and will not defend the racism that is already known at Disney. However, I will say that they are making improvements, slowly but surely. Yes, the majority of their princesses are blue-eyed Caucasians, but they have in the past 2 decades introduced 5 minority ethinities into the Disney Princess family. With the most recent one being African American. I will state that I don't agree with the fact that the first African American Princess they had was a frog for 2/3rds of the movie, but I do think that Tiana is an adorable character and great personality to add the to Disney Princess gang and I hope they have many more African American and different Ethnicity princesses to come. I would even LOVE to have a bi-racial couple or even a homosexual one. I do believe that in the future the racism will only diminish and more beautiful different Ethnicity Princesses will continue to join the Disney Princess family.
If you have made it through this long rant, wow, I really can't believe anyone is going to make it through this whole blog. Haha but if you have congratulations, I would love to know your thoughts! Please tell me if you disagree or agree or have another issue you would like addressed!